Pros:
- Border security: Proponents of the fence argue that it would enhance border security by deterring illegal immigration and drug trafficking, as well as help control the flow of people and goods across the border.
- Immigration control: Completing the border fence could make it more difficult for undocumented immigrants to enter the United States, allowing for better management of immigration policies and reducing the strain on resources such as education, healthcare, and law enforcement.
- Crime reduction: Some argue that a complete border fence would reduce crime rates in the United States by preventing the entry of criminals and gang members.
Cons:
- Cost: The completion of the border fence would require significant funding, which some argue could be better invested in other areas such as education, infrastructure, or healthcare.
- Environmental concerns: The construction of a border fence could potentially damage the environment, fragment habitats, disrupt ecosystems, and hinder the movement of wildlife.
- Human rights concerns: Critics of the border fence argue that it would violate human rights, potentially separating families and impeding the movement of people seeking asylum or fleeing violence.
- Economic impact: The border fence could have a negative impact on the economies of border communities, as it may disrupt cross-border trade, tourism, and other economic activities.
Ultimately, the decision of whether to complete the US border fence with Mexico is a complex one that involves balancing security concerns with ethical and resource considerations. It requires careful assessment and consideration of various factors, including the specific context and circumstances of the US-Mexico border region.
