Where is the safest place to hide in end of world?

The concept of hiding or finding the "safest place to hide" in an end-of-the-world scenario is highly unrealistic and fictional. An actual end-of-the-world event, assuming it existed, would likely be too devastating for anyone to survive regardless of location.

Here are some fictional or theoretical considerations related to end-of-the-world events:

Deep Underground Bunkers: In some fictional end-of-the-world scenarios, characters retreat to heavily fortified and remote underground bunkers designed to withstand extreme events like meteor impacts, massive volcanic eruptions, or nuclear winter. However, creating such bunkers and ensuring long-term sustainability present real-world challenges.

Remote Wilderness or Mountain Locations: If an end-of-the-world events involves major disasters or resource depletion, remote and naturally diverse areas like wilderness or mountains might offer survival benefits, but challenges like unpredictable weather and limited resources remain significant

Self-Sustaining Space Stations: While not widely available, hypothetical and highly advanced scientific efforts could theoretically design space stations capable of sustaining a tiny fraction of humanity in orbit long enough to outlast certain doomsday scenarios. However, creating such technology is challenging and complex in practice.

It's crucial to realize that real-world end-of-the-world scenarios are difficult to predict or mitigate. Survival would mostly depend on preparation, adaptability, maintaining resource supplies, and cooperation within communities rather than finding one safest hiding spot as depicted in many fictional works.