Why might people in Tennessee 1925 have wanted to outlaw the textbook a civic biology?

The state of Tennessee passed the Butler Act in 1925, which prohibited the teaching of evolution and other topics that contradicted the literal interpretation of the Bible in public schools. The act cited the textbook Civic Biology as one objectionable text, arguing that it taught children "that man has descended from a lower order of animals."

The Butler Act faced criticism and was ultimately overturned in court proceedings, but it offers insight into the concerns of some Tennesseans in 1925.

1.Religious Opposition: At the time, Tennessee had a strong conservative protestant population, primarily associated with rural area. Many people considered evolution to contradict the biblical narrative of creation as described in the book of Genesis. They saw the teaching of evolution as a violation of their religious beliefs and a threat to their faith .

2. Fear of Social Darwinism: Social Darwinism is the application of evolutionary theory to society, arguing that individuals, groups, or races considered "fit" should prosper while those deemed "unfit" struggle or die out. Some Tennesseans feared that teaching evolution might promote social Darwinist ideas and threaten the social order.

3. Traditional Beliefs: Rural communities in Tennessee, like many parts of the southern US, had strong and well established traditional beliefs. For some people, these traditional values included a literal interpretation of the Bible, and any contradicting scientific theories, such as evolution, were seen as a threat to their way of life.

4. Limited Scientific Knowledge: In the early 20th century, scientific understanding was not as advanced as it is today. Some people may have genuinely believed that the biblical account of human creation was accurate, and they saw no reason to challenge this belief with scientific evidence.

It's important to note that not everyone in Tennessee supported the Butler Act or its goals. Many individuals and organizations, including scientists, educators, and even religious leaders, protested the act, contending that it stifled scientific inquiry and violated principles of academic freedom.

Copyright Wanderlust World © https://www.ynyoo.com