There are a number of arguments in favor of the NYSC program. First, it helps to promote national unity by bringing together young people from all over the country to serve in different communities. This allows young people to learn about different cultures and perspectives, and to develop a sense of national identity. Second, the NYSC program helps to promote development by providing young people with the opportunity to contribute to their communities. Corps members are often involved in community development projects, such as building schools and hospitals, and providing healthcare and education services. Third, the NYSC program helps to prepare young people for the workforce by giving them the opportunity to develop leadership, teamwork, and communication skills.
However, there are also a number of arguments against the NYSC program. First, it is argued that the program is a waste of time and resources. Corps members are often paid a stipend that is not enough to cover their living expenses, and they are often not given adequate training or support. Second, it is argued that the program is discriminatory, as it only applies to graduates of universities and polytechnics. This means that young people who do not have a higher education are not given the same opportunity to serve their country. Third, it is argued that the program is not effective in promoting national unity or development. Corps members are often posted to communities where they are not needed or wanted, and they may not be able to make a significant contribution to the community.
Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to retain the NYSC program is a complex one. There are a number of factors to consider, including the pros and cons of the program, the cost-effectiveness of the program, and the impact of the program on national unity and development.
