Founding of Connecticut and Rhode Island: Religious Freedom and Dissent
Both colonies emerged from Puritan dissent in Massachusetts Bay, but for different reasons and with distinct characters.
Connecticut (1636)
- Leader: Rev. Thomas Hooker.
- Motive: Disagreed with Massachusetts' restrictive suffrage (church membership required to vote). Sought broader political participation for godly men.
- Settlement: Hartford, Windsor, Wethersfield → Connecticut Colony.
- Government: Fundamental Orders (1639) — first written constitution in America, creating a self-governing republic with elected governor/legislature.
- Economy: Mixed farming, trade, shipbuilding. Thriving, orderly.
Rhode Island (1636)
- Leader: Roger Williams, Salem minister.
- Banishment: 1635 — preached separation of church and state, fair dealings with Native Americans, against oaths to unregenerate magistrates.
- Settlement: Providence (purchased from Narragansett sachems). Later Portsmouth, Newport, Warwick united as Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations (1663 charter).
- Distinctive: Absolute religious liberty — Jews, Quakers, Baptists, Antinomians welcome. No established church. First Baptist church in America (1638).
- Economy: Maritime trade, rum, slave trade (later), religious diversity attracted merchants.
Contrast
| Connecticut | Rhode Island |
| Ordered, theocratic but expanding suffrage | Radical liberty, church-state separation |
| Hooker: "foundation of authority is consent" | Williams: "forced worship stinks in God's nostrils" |
| Fundamental Orders (constitutionalism) | Royal Charter 1663 (liberty guarantee) |