In the late 19th century, American and European sugar planters in Hawaii were the loudest voices calling for U.S. annexation. Their motivations blended profit, politics, and prejudice.
The 1875 Reciprocity Treaty already gave Hawaiian sugar duty-free entry. But planters feared renewal wasn't guaranteed. Annexation made it permanent—no tariffs, no uncertainty.
The Hawaiian monarchy was unstable (1887 Bayonet Constitution, 1893 overthrow). Planters wanted U.S. legal protection for their land, labor contracts, and capital.
American warships frequented Pearl Harbor. U.S. business interests dominated banking, shipping, and trade. Annexation formalized existing control.
By 1890s, Japanese immigrants were the largest plantation workforce. Some planters saw annexation as a way to limit Japanese political power and maintain a stratified labor system.
Planters like Sanford Dole, Lorrin Thurston, Claus Spreckels had direct lines to Congress, the State Department, and naval officers. They framed annexation as manifest destiny and naval necessity.
Some smaller growers and Asian planters opposed annexation, fearing loss of autonomy or U.S. labor laws. Native Hawaiians overwhelmingly resisted.
The 1898 Newlands Resolution annexed Hawaii. Planters got their territorial government, tariff security, and eventual statehood (1959)—but at the cost of Hawaiian sovereignty.