Old London Bridge vs. Modern Thames Crossings: 600 Years of Engineering Evolution
For 622 years (1209–1831), Old London Bridge was the *only* dry crossing of the tidal Thames in London. Its replacement by modern bridges marks the shift from medieval urbanism to industrial metropolis.
Old London Bridge (1176–1209, stood until 1832)
- Structure: 19 irregular stone arches on starlings (pier foundations of rubble-filled caissons on gravel). Piers occupied ~80% of river width.
- Houses & Shops: ~140 structures, up to 7 stories, overhanging the roadway. Rent funded maintenance. A street *on* the bridge.
- Drawbridge & Gates: Central bascule (drawbridge) for tall masts. Stone gatehouses (portcullises, heads on spikes). Closed at curfew.
- Hydraulic Impact: Piers created a weir effect—5–7 ft water level difference upstream vs. downstream. Dangerous "shooting the bridge" for boats.
- Traffic: Narrow (12–15 ft between houses), one-way alternating, chronic gridlock. Carts, herds, pedestrians.
Modern Bridges (Tower, London, Millennium, etc.)
- Materials: Steel, concrete, pre-stressed, cable-stayed, suspension.
- Clearance: High fixed spans (Tower Bridge: 140 ft bascules open) or sufficient air draft—no mast lowering.
- Capacity: Multi-lane vehicle, dedicated cycle/pedestrian, sometimes rail (rail/road combos).
- Foundations: Deep caissons, piles to London Clay/Chalk. No starlings.
- No Housing: Pure transport corridors.
- Hydraulics: Minimal flow obstruction. Piers aligned with current.
The Transition
New London Bridge (Rennie, 1831)—5 granite arches, no houses—replaced Old. Itself sold/rebuilt in Lake Havasu, AZ (1971). Current London Bridge (1973) is a concrete box girder. The medieval anomaly is gone; the river flows freely.