Generally, no—you cannot hold a driver liable for an accident they were not involved in. Tort law requires causation: the defendant's actions must be a direct or proximate cause of the harm. A driver physically absent from the collision cannot be the factual cause.
Vehicle owner lends car to someone they know (or should know) is incompetent, unlicensed, intoxicated, or reckless. Owner liable for resulting harm.
Employer liable for employee's negligent driving within scope of employment—even if employer wasn't in the vehicle.
Many states: bars/restaurants/hosts who serve alcohol to visibly intoxicated persons (or minors) can be liable if that person causes a crash.
Government entities or contractors responsible for hazardous road conditions (missing signs, potholes, poor design) may share liability.
Manufacturer/seller liable if defect (brakes, tires, software) caused/contributed to crash.
Rare: if a non-present driver coordinated with the at-fault driver (e.g., street racing, intentional ramming), they may be jointly liable.
If a non-involved driver's specific, direct action (e.g., shining laser, throwing object, intentional brake-check) caused the crash, they could be liable—but mere presence or lawful driving isn't enough.
Liability follows causation. A driver not at the scene is almost never the legal cause—unless a specific legal doctrine links their conduct to the crash.