The EFCC is often understaffed and lacks the necessary resources to effectively investigate and prosecute corruption cases. This shortage of resources can hamper the EFCC's ability to gather evidence, interview witnesses, and bring cases to court.
2. Lack of public trust
The EFCC has been criticized for being selective in its investigations and prosecutions, and for being used as a political tool to target opponents of the government. This lack of public trust can make it difficult for the EFCC to gather information and support from the public, which is essential for successful investigations and prosecutions.
3. Political interference
The EFCC is subject to political influence, which can affect its independence and effectiveness. This interference can come from the executive branch, the legislature, or even the judiciary. Political interference can result in cases being dropped, evidence being suppressed, or witnesses being intimidated.
4. Corruption within the EFCC
There have been allegations of corruption within the EFCC itself. This can undermine the agency's credibility and effectiveness, and make it difficult for the EFCC to investigate and prosecute corruption cases. These allegations include cases of bribery, extortion, and abuse of power.
5. Lack of capacity
The EFCC lacks the capacity to effectively prosecute all the corruption cases before it. This is due to several factors such as insufficient manpower, inadequate funding, poor prosecution strategy, etc. The shortage of manpower and resources has made it difficult for the EFCC to diligently conduct investigations
