Why did Bolivar reject the US form of government for liberated nations Spanish south America?

Political Instability: Bolívar had closely observed the political turmoil and instability in the United States during his time in Philadelphia. He witnessed frequent changes in government, partisan politics, and the struggle between the federal and state governments. Bolívar feared that such instability could hinder the unity and stability of newly independent nations in South America.

Centralism vs. Federalism: Bolívar favored a centralized form of government rather than a federal system like that of the United States. He believed that strong centralized authority was necessary to maintain order, prevent regionalism, and ensure the unity of the newly independent nations. He feared that a federal system could lead to divisions, conflicts between regions, and weaken the overall strength of the nation.

Cultural and Historical Background: Bolívar was influenced by the political ideas and traditions of Latin America, which emphasized the importance of strong executive power and centralized authority. He drew inspiration from the colonial system, which had a centralized form of governance with the king or viceroy at the helm. Bolívar believed that this legacy of centralized authority resonated with the cultural and historical context of Spanish South America.

Fear of Foreign Intervention: Bolívar was cautious of the potential intervention and influence of foreign powers, especially the United States, in the newly independent nations. He worried that the United States could take advantage of a weak central government and interfere in internal affairs, posing a threat to the sovereignty and independence of these nations. Bolívar preferred a strong central government that could resist foreign influence and protect the interests of the newly formed states.

Influence of European Political Philosophy: Bolívar was influenced by the political philosophies and ideas of European Enlightenment thinkers, such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Thomas Hobbes, who advocated for centralized authority and strong leadership to maintain social order and prevent chaos. He believed that a centralized government was essential to establishing stability, promoting economic development, and ensuring the welfare of the people in the liberated nations of Spanish South America.