Concrete vs. Asphalt Runways

There is a longstanding debate over whether concrete or asphalt is the better material to construct airport runways. Both have their advantages and disadvantages, although some, such as cost, vary with the availability of material.
  1. Load Bearing

    • Asphalt is a "soft" material that bends and flexes under the heavy load of a jumbo jet. Concrete will simply crack and break if enough pressure is placed on it.

    Durability

    • Concrete withstands heat much better than asphalt, which can actually melt on a really hot day or from the heat of a jet's turbine exhaust.

    Porous Asphalt

    • Porous asphalt absorbs water better than concrete, which is susceptible to potentially dangerous standing water.

    Rough Surface

    • Under the right conditions, the rough surface of asphalt can cause jet tires to burst. Concrete's smoother surface makes it harder to stop a jet, however.

    Combination of the Two

    • Some airports use a combination of the two surfaces: concrete for taxiways and the gates where jets will be parked for long periods and asphalt for the actual runway.

Copyright Wanderlust World © https://www.ynyoo.com